Contact Us Search Paper

The Legalhood of Artificial Intelligence: AI Applications as Energy Services

Lambrini Seremeti1, 2, Ioannis Kougias2, *

Corresponding Author:

Ioannis Kougias

Affiliation(s):

1 School of Education, Frederick University, Nicosia, Cyprus. Email: [email protected]

2 Laboratory, of Interdisciplinary Semantic Interconnected Symbiotic Education Environments, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Peloponnese, Greece. Email: [email protected]

*Corresponding Author


Abstract:

The importance of data has increased in the last century and these days it is an essential resource for any human activity as well as a vital component for our society. The use of AI is a major improvement in handling these data, the amount of which is becoming enormous. In a regulatory perspective, AI applications have an impact on the social and economic structure and the rights and values on which it is based upon. This paper is a crucial step on the path of building a consensus on the legal hypostasis of AI. It is our belief that unforeseeable and ground-breaking AI applications can be regulatorily tackled with respect to energy law.

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, data, energy services, supplementary law interpretation

Downloads: 155 Views: 1330
Cite This Paper:

Lambrini Seremeti, Ioannis Kougias (2021). The Legalhood of Artificial Intelligence: AI Applications as Energy Services. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Systems, 3, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.33969/AIS.2021.31006.

References:

[1] Beard, J.M. (2018) The principle of proportionality in an era of high technology. In: W. S. Williams and C. M. Ford (eds) Complex Battlespaces: The Law of Armed Conflict and the Dynamics of Modern Warfare, Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3119384 

[2] Bird, E., Fox-Skelly, J., Jenner, N., Larbey, R., Weitkamp, E., Winfield, A. (2020) The ethics of artificial intelligence: Issues and initiatives. Study of the Panel for the Future of Science and Technology for the European Parliament. DOI: 10.2861/6644.

[3] Boire, R. (2018) Understanding AI in a world of bid data. Big Data and Information Analytics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 22-42. DOI: 10.3934/bdia.2018001.

[4] Brown, R.D. (2020) Property ownership and the legal personhood of artificial intelligence. Information & Communications Technology Law, Vol. 30, Issue 2, 208-234. DOI: 10.1080/13600834.2020.1861714.

[5] Chesterman, S. (2020) Artificial intelligence and the limits of legal personality. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 69, No. 4, 819-844. DOI: 10.1017/S0020589320000366.

[6] Daci, J. (2010) Legal principles, legal values and legal norms: are they the same or different? Academicus International Scientific Journal, Vol. 2, 2010, ISSN: 2309-1088-2010-02-11.

[7] The European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2018) A definition of AI: Main capabilities and scientific disciplines. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=56341

[8] European Commission. (2020) Artificial Intelligence and Civil Liability. https://europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/621926/IPOL_STU(2020)621926_EN.pdf

[9] European Commission. (2021) New rules for Artificial Intelligence – Q&As. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/QANDA_21_1683#1

[10] Gordon, J.S. (2020) Artificial moral and legal personhood. AI & Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01063-2 

[11] Heffron, R.J., Ronne, A., Tomain, J.P., Bradbrook, A., K. Talus, K. (2018) A treatise for energy law. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, Vol. 11, Issue 1, 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwx039

[12] Imhonopi, D., Onifade, C.A., Urim, U.M. (2013) Collective behaviour and social movements: a conceptual review. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 9, 76-85. Online ISSN: 2222-2863, www.iiste.org 

[13] Kastellec, J.P. (2007) The structure of legal rules and the analysis of judicial decisions. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.960190 

[14] Lee, A.J., Cook, P.S. (2020) The myth of the “data-driven” society: Exploring the interactions of data interfaces, circulations, and abstractions. Sociology Compass, Vol. 14, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12749

[15] Lior, A. (2020) AI entities as AI agents: artificial intelligence liability and the respondeat superior analogy. Mitchell Hamline Law Review, Vol. 46, Issue 5. https://open.mitchelhamline.edu/mhlr/vol46/iss5/2

[16] Nordtveit, E. (2020) International energy law in perspective. The relationship between national and international energy law. Routledge Handbook of Energy Law. https://www.routledgehanbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780429450891-4

[17] Ponnusamy, B. (2018) The role of artificial intelligence in future technology. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering, Vol. 5, Issue 4, 146-148. DOI: 10.26562/IJIRAE.2018.APAE10087

[18] Sbolci, L. (2011) Supplementary means of interpretation. In: E. Cannizzaro, The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention, Oxford Scholarship Online. DOI: 1093/acprof:oso/9780199588916.001.0001

[19] Stone, P., Brooks, R., Brynjolfsson, E., Calo, R., Etzioni, O., Hager, G., Hirschherg, J., Kalyanakrishnan, S., Kamar, E., Kraus, S., Leyton-Brown, K., Parkes, D., Press, W., Saxenian, A., Shah, J., Tambe, M., Teller, A. (2016) Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030. One Hundred Year Study of Artificial Intelligence: Report of the 2015-2016 Study Panel, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. 1-52. DOI: ai100.stanford.edu/2016-report

[20] Zariski, A. (2014) Legal interpretation. Skills and techniques for making sense of Law. In: A Zariski, Legal Literacy: An Introduction to Legal Studies, AU Press. DOI: 10.15215/aupress/9781927356449.01

[21] Zibren, J. (2018) Legal personhood: animals, artificial intelligence and the unborn. Marasyk University Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 12, Issue 1, 81-87. DOI: 10.5817/MUJLT2018-1-5