Contact Us Search Paper

A Survey on Blockchain Scalability Technologies

Rui Chang1, Xuewen Dong1,*, Wei Tong2, Xiaojie Guo1, Zesong Dong1, and Yiheng Lou1

Corresponding Author:

Xuewen Dong

Affiliation(s):

1College of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710071, China

2School of Information Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou, 310018, China

*Corresponding author


Abstract:

Blockchain technology, with its features of decentralization, immutability, and traceability, shows broad application potential in fields such as finance, supply chain, and the Internet of Things (IoT). However, as application scenarios expand and the number of users surges, blockchain systems face severe challenges in scalability. Based on the limitations of the traditional single-chain architecture, this paper comprehensively reviews mainstream blockchain scaling solutions from two dimensions: on-chain scaling and off-chain scaling. On-chain scaling covers sharding technology and consensus mechanism optimization; off-chain scaling includes payment channel networks and Layer-2 Rollups. By comparing and analyzing the technical principles, advantages, limitations, and applicable scenarios of various solutions, this paper reveals that “on-chain basic optimization and off-chain collaborative scaling" has become the mainstream direction of blockchain scalability research. Building on this, Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG) are highlighted in a separate section, detailing the technical principles and representative systems of three DAG solutions: natural structure, parallel structure, and main-chain structure. Finally, the paper looks forward to the future research trends of blockchain data structures and scaling technologies, providing a reference for theoretical research and engineering practice in related fields.

Keywords:

Blockchain, Scalability, Sharding technology, Payment channel networks, Layer-2 Rollups, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG)

Downloads: 1 Views: 6
Cite This Paper:

Rui Chang, Xuewen Dong, Wei Tong, Xiaojie Guo, Zesong Dong, and Yiheng Lou (2026). A Survey on Blockchain Scalability Technologies. Journal of Networking and Network Applications, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp. 74–86. https://doi.org/10.33969/J-NaNA.2026.060204.

References:

[1] Satoshi Nakamoto. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Bitcoin.–URL: https://bitcoin. org/bitcoin. pdf, 4(2):15, 2008.

[2] Thippa Reddy Gadekallu, Thien Huynh-The, Weizheng Wang, Gokul Yenduri, Pasika Ranaweera, Quoc-Viet Pham, Daniel Benevides da Costa, and Madhusanka Liyanage. Blockchain for the metaverse: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.09738, 2022.

[3] Maher Boughdiri, Takoua Abdellatif, and Chirine Ghedira Guegan. A systematic literature review on blockchain storage scalability. IEEE Access, 2025.

[4] Wei Tong, Jian Li, Lingxiao Yang, Xiyan Huang, Xiangshang Gao, and Zesong Dong. A survey on blockchain scalability. In 2024 International Conference on Blockchain, Metaverse and Trustworthy Systems (BlockSys), pages 133–147. Springer Nature Singapore, 2024.

[5] Kyle Croman, Christian Decker, Ittay Eyal, Adem Efe Gencer, Ari Juels, Ahmed Kosba, Andrew Miller, Prateek Saxena, Elaine Shi, Emin Gün Sirer, et al. On scaling decentralized blockchains: (a position paper). In International conference on financial cryptography and data security, pages 106–125. Springer, 2016.

[6] Qin Wang, Jiangshan Yu, Shiping Chen, and Yang Xiang. Sok: Dag-based blockchain systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12):1–38, 2023.

[7] Diana Hawashin, Mohamed Nemer, Senay A Gebreab, Khaled Salah, Raja Jayaraman, Muhammad Khurram Khan, and Ernesto Damiani. Blockchain applications in uav industry: Review, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 230:103932, 2024.

[8] Yuqi Xie, Changbing Tang, Zhiyi Chen, Jingang Lai, Zhonglong Zheng, and Xinghuo Yu. Towards proof-of-prospect consensus mechanism for maximizing consumers’ satisfaction in distributed energy systems. Science China Information Sciences, 69(2):122202, 2026.

[9] Ziqiang Xu, Ahmad Salehi Shahraki, and Naveen Chilamkurti. A fault-tolerant sharding mechanism for resilience and scalability in blockchain using backup pool. Future Generation Computer Systems, 174:107982, 2026.

[10] Asmaa Aldoubaee, Noor Hafizah Hassan, and Fiza Abdul Rahim. A systematic review on blockchain scalability. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(9):774–784, 2023.

[11] Jianting Zhang, Zicong Hong, Xiaoyu Qiu, Wuhui Chen, Yufeng Zhan, and Song Guo. Scaling blockchain via dynamic sharding. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2025.

[12] Gang Wang, Zhijie Jerry Shi, Mark Nixon, and Song Han. Sok: Sharding on blockchain. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies, pages 41–61, 2019.

[13] Brandon Liew Yi Quan, Nur Haliza Abdul Wahab, Arafat Al-Dhaqm, Ahmad Alshammari, Ali Aqarni, Shukor Abd Razak, and Koh Tieng Wei. Recent advances in sharding techniques for scalable blockchain networks: A review. IEEE Access, 13:21335–21366, 2024.

[14] Fahad Rahman, Chafiq Titouna, and Farid Naït-Abdesselam. Efficient shard load balancing for scalable blockchain systems. Cluster Comput-ing, 28(8):506, 2025.

[15] Yizhong Liu, Andi Liu, Zhuocheng Pan, Yuxuan Hu, Jianwei Liu, Song Bian, Yuan Lu, Zhenyu Guan, Dawei Li, and Meikang Qiu. Realizing corrupted-shard tolerance: A sharding blockchain with preserving global resilience. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 2099–2113, 2025.

[16] Chang Liu, Kang Ning, P Takis Mathiopoulos, Zheng Xue, and Guojun Han. A novel dual-layer multi-shard blockchain architecture for vehicle data sharing. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2026.

[17] Li Lu, Linfu Sun, and Yisheng Zou. An efficient sharding consensus protocol for improving blockchain scalability. Computer Communica-tions, 231:108032, 2025.

[18] Yan Wang, Zheng Gong, Dayu Jia, Aiping Tan, and Minchao Liu. Dynamic sharding model and performance optimization method for consortium blockchain: Y. wang et al. The Journal of Supercomputing, 81(2):411, 2025.

[19] Luyi Zhang, Yujue Wang, Yong Ding, Hai Liang, Changsong Yang, and Chunhai Li. Sharding technologies in blockchain: Basics, state of the art, and challenges. In International Conference on Blockchain and Trustworthy Systems, pages 242–255. Springer, 2023.

[20] Huawei Huang, Zhaokang Yin, Qinde Chen, Jian Zheng, Xiaofei Luo, Guang Ye, Xiaowen Peng, Zibin Zheng, and Song Guo. Brokerchain: A blockchain sharding protocol by exploiting broker accounts. IEEE Transactions on Networking, 2025.

[21] Xiaorong Zhu, Zhiwei Yuan, and Qinyin Ni. A self evolving high performance sharded consortium blockchain designed for secure and trusted resource sharing for 6g networks. Scientific Reports, 15(1):28098, 2025.

[22] Huawei Huang, Jian Zheng, Xuanye Zhu, Yue Lin, Ting Cai, Lu Zhou, Zibin Zheng, and Song Guo. Shardcutter: A blockchain sharding protocol achieving transaction workload balance across state shards. IEEE Transactions on Networking, 2026.

[23] Hao Xu, Jiaqi Zhang, Xiulong Liu, Zhimin Yu, Tingyu Fan, Baochao Chen, and Keqiu Li. Tangram: Enabling efficient and balanced dynamic storage extension on sharding blockchain systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2025.

[24] Guoqiong Liao, Yinxiang Lei, Yufang Xie, and Neal N Xiong. Lsbsp: A lightweight sharding method of blockchain based on state pruning for efficient data sharing in iomt. Computers, Materials & Continua, 82(2), 2025.

[25] Kaimin Zhang, Xingwei Wang, Bo Yi, Min Huang, Lin Qiu, Enliang Lv, and Jingjing Guo. A reliable distributed-cloud storage based on permissioned blockchain. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 18(3):1216–1231, 2025.

[26] Nana Akua Nkansa Adu-Amankwa and Farzad Rahimian. Harnessing blockchain-enabled digital twins for building commissioning: Examining practitioners’ perspectives. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(3):1891–1906, 2026.

[27] A Simbu, S Nandakumar, and K Saravanan. Blockchain-driven smart contract with key exchange protocol for secure device-to-device com-munication using verkle tree k-ary structures. Scientific Reports, 2026.

[28] Jan Oberst. Towards stateless clients in ethereum: Benchmarking verkle trees and binary merkle trees with snarks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.14069, 2025.

[29] Lei Tian, Feilong Lin, Jiahao Gan, Jiahao Qi, Riheng Jia, Zhonglong Zheng, Minglu Li, and Xuemin Shen. Enhancing security in parallel federated learning with sharded blockchain for internet of vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2025.

[30] Mahdi Zamani, Mahnush Movahedi, and Mariana Raykova. Rapidchain: Scaling blockchain via full sharding. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, pages 931–948, 2018.

[31] Xiangdong Guo, Yuting Zhang, Jingfa Yao, Guifa Teng, et al. Per-formance optimization of agricultural traceability blockchain based on sharding technology. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods, 17(2):213–231, 2025.

[32] Yan Wang, Hao Wang, and Yanghuang Cao. Comprehensive review of storage optimization techniques in blockchain systems. Applied Sciences, 15(1):243, 2024.

[33] Xiaofei Luo, Junhao Wu, Baozhou Xie, Jian Zheng, Qinde Chen, and Huawei Huang. A survey of sharding blockchains on performance and scalability. pages 105–118, 2025.

[34] Mahran Morsidi, Sharul Tajuddin, SH Shah Newaz, Ravi Kumar Patch-muthu, and Gyu Myoung Lee. A review on blockchain sharding for improving scalability. Future Internet, 17(10):481, 2025.

[35] Yang Xiao, Ning Zhang, Wenjing Lou, and Y Thomas Hou. A survey of distributed consensus protocols for blockchain networks. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 22(2):1432–1465, 2020.

[36] Shehar Bano, Alberto Sonnino, Mustafa Al-Bassam, Sarah Azouvi, Patrick McCorry, Sarah Meiklejohn, and George Danezis. Sok: Consensus in the age of blockchains. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies, pages 183–198, 2019.

[37] Xunqiang Lan, Xiao Tang, Ruonan Zhang, Bin Li, Qinghe Du, Dusit Niyato, and Zhu Han. Distributionally robust game for proof-of-work blockchain mining under resource uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 21:1036–1049, 2026.

[38] Zhijun Wu, Hanwen Xu, Zhiquan Liu, Meng Yue, and Yanrong Lu. Defending pow blockchains against game-theoretic dos attacks: A ra-tional strategy analysis. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2026.

[39] Bolun Yang, Jiamin Hao, Yao Ma, and Li Zhou. The optimal mining strategy of proof of stake consensus in peercoin blockchain. Electronics, 15(5):974, 2026.

[40] Shymaa M Arafat. A study of blockchain consensus protocols. Cyber-security, 9(1):120, 2026.

[41] Kevin Werbach. Summary of blockchain governance in the wild. In The Blockchain Scholars Book: Current Academic Insights Condensed for Busy Practitioners, pages 143–149. Springer, 2026.

[42] Miguel Castro, Barbara Liskov, et al. Practical byzantine fault tolerance. In OsDI, volume 99, pages 173–186, 1999.

[43] Dakai Kang, Suyash Gupta, Dahlia Malkhi, and Mohammad Sadoghi. Hotstuff-1: Linear consensus with one-phase speculation. Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data, 3(3):1–29, 2025.

[44] Ali Ahmed Al-awamy, Nagi Al-shaibany, Axel Sikora, and Dominik Welte. Hybrid consensus mechanisms in blockchain: a comprehensive review. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2025(1):5821997, 2025.

[45] Jianhua Liu, Xin Wang, Guangtao Xue, Tong Liu, and Minglu Li. An eca regret learning game for cross-tier computation offloading against swarm attacks in sensor edge cloud. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 11(1):1201–1216, 2023.

[46] Soumen Giri, Manasi Roy, Sujoy Bandyopadhyay, Sourav Das, Sutanu Mangal, and Subhankar Samanta. Metal–organic frameworks: clas-sifications, synthesis, structure–property–performance relationship, and techno-economic analysis of redox flow batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 13(25):19193–19235, 2025.

[47] Yuhui Huo, Xiaolu Luo, Zhen Lu, Yihan Lu, Qi Cai, Miao Hu, and Dong Tang. Scaling efficiency and incentive mechanism optimization in the bitcoin lightning network. In 2025 lEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2025.

[48] Nichole King-Price. Optimizing global micropayments through bitcoin’s on-chain architecture for enhanced scalability and economic efficiency. 2026.

[49] Stefan Dziembowski, Sebastian Faust, and Kristina Hostáková. General state channel networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, pages 949–966, 2018.

[50] Vibhaalakshmi Sivaraman, Shaileshh Bojja Venkatakrishnan, Kathleen Ruan, Parimarjan Negi, Lei Yang, Radhika Mittal, Giulia Fanti, and Mohammad Alizadeh. High throughput cryptocurrency routing in payment channel networks. In 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 20), pages 777–796, 2020.

[51] Lingxiao Yang, Xuewen Dong, Wei Tong, Shiyang Ma, Hui Qiao, and Siyu Xing. Secure off-chain payment in consortium blockchain system. In 2020 International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA), pages 259–264. IEEE, 2020.

[52] Rene Pickhardt. A mathematical theory of payment channel networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.04835, 2026.

[53] Kartick Kolachala, Mohammed Ababneh, and Roopa Vishwanathan. Sok: Payment channel networks. In 2024 Conference on Building a Secure & Empowered Cyberspace (BuildSEC), pages 28–35. IEEE, 2024.

[54] David Lobmaier, Rafael Konlechner, Stefan Schulte, and Ingo Weber. Assessing routing algorithms for payment channel networks. Distributed Ledger Technologies: Research and Practice, 3(1):1–27, 2024.

[55] Qiushi Wei, Yuhui Zhang, Dejun Yang, and Guoliang Xue. Bar: A balance-aware routing protocol in payment channel networks. In ICC 2025-IEEE International Conference on Communications, pages 2647–2652. IEEE, 2025.

[56] Longxia Huang, Changzhi Huo, Chengzhi Ge, and Mengmeng Yang. Aero: An adaptive and efficient routing for off-chain payment channel networks. Computer Networks, 257:111009, 2025.

[57] Padraig Corcoran and Irena Spasić. Path planning at the edge of payment channel networks. Distributed Ledger Technologies: Research and Practice, 2025.

[58] Hasan Falah Hasan, Mohd Najwadi Yusoff, Je Sen Teh, and Shams Mh-mood Abdali. Emcpf: Efficient multi-party conditional payment flow payment protocol on lightning payment channel network. Blockchain: Research and Applications, page 100359, 2025.

[59] Xiaoxue Zhang and Chen Qian. A flexible cross-chain payment channel network. IEEE Transactions on Networking, 2026.

[60] Lingxiao Yang, Xuewen Dong, Wei Wang, Yong Yu, Sheng Gao, Qiang Qu, and Yulong Shen. Share: Optimizing secure hub allocation and routing efficiency in payment channel networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04236, 2025.

[61] Lingxiao Yang, Xuewen Dong, Sheng Gao, Qiang Qu, Xiaodong Zhang, Wensheng Tian, and Yulong Shen. Optimal hub placement and deadlock-free routing for payment channel network scalability. In 2023 IEEE 43rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pages 692–702. IEEE, 2023.

[62] Zeta Avarikioti, Yuheng Wang, and Yuyi Wang. Thunderdome:{Timelock-Free} {Rationally-Secure} virtual channels. In 34th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 25), pages 4187–4204, 2025.

[63] Lukas Aumayr, Esra Ceylan, Yannik Kopyciok, Matteo Maffei, Pedro Moreno-Sanchez, Iosif Salem, and Stefan Schmid. Optimizing virtual payment channel establishment in the face of on-path adversaries. Computer Communications, 238:108155, 2025.

[64] Anqi Tian, Peifang Ni, Yingzi Gao, and Jing Xu. Horcrux: Synthesize, split, shift and stay alive; preventing channel depletion via universal and enhanced multi-hop payments. IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch., 2024:1338, 2024.

[65] Minghui Xu, Wenxuan Yu, Guangyong Shang, Guangpeng Qi, Dongliang Duan, Shan Wang, Kun Li, Yue Zhang, and Xiuzhen Cheng. Starfish: Rebalancing multi-party off-chain payment channels. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20536, 2025.

[66] Stefan Dziembowski, Shahriar Ebrahimi, Omkar Gavhane, and Susil Ku-mar Mohanty. Universal channel rebalancing: Flexible coin shifting in payment channel networks. Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2025.

[67] Yevhenii Shcherbina. Comparative analysis of layer 2 scaling techniques: Rollups, sidechains and lightning network in blockchain systems. Emerg-ing Frontiers Library for The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(10):75–82, 2025.

[68] Margarita Capretto, Martín Ceresa, Antonio Fernandez Anta, Pedro Moreno-Sanchez, and César Sánchez. A secure sequencer and data availability committee for rollups. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 2129–2143, 2025.

[69] Stefanos Chaliasos, Denis Firsov, and Benjamin Livshits. Towards a formal foundation for blockchain zk rollups. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 2714–2728, 2025.

[70] Adrià Torralba-Agell, Ghazaleh Keshavarzkalhori, Cristina Pérez Solà, David Megías, Jordi Herrera Joancomartí, et al. Unmasking the illusion: The shortcomings of “zero-knowledge” rollups in achieving privacy. XVIII Reunión Española sobre Criptología y Seguridad de la Información: XVIII RECSI, pages 361–366, 2024.

[71] Li Quan. Distributed transparent data layer for next generation blockchains. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, pages 1178–1181, 2024.

[72] Birenjith Sasidharan, Emanuele Viterbo, and Son Hoang Dau. Block circulant codes with application to decentralized systems. IEEE Trans-actions on Communications, 2025.

[73] Antonio Villafranca, Igor Tasic, Victor Gallegos, Almudena Gimenez, Jesus Ochoa Rego, Juan Antonio Fernandez, and Maria-Dolores Cano. Comparing blockchain and dag technologies for smart agriculture trace-ability in terms of efficiency and latency. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 142:103131, 2025.

[74] Anderson Melo de Morais, Fernando Antonio Aires Lins, and Nel-son Souto Rosa. Selecting consensus algorithm integrations in a dag-based blockchain for iot using genetic algorithms. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 17(1):55–71, 2026.

[75] Lang Li, Dongyan Huang, and Chengyao Zhang. An efficient dag blockchain architecture for iot. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(2):1286–1296, 2022.

[76] Xuewen Dong, Yi Liu, Teng Li, Xiaojie Guo, Youliang Tian, Yulong Shen, and Xiaojiang Du. Lbft-dag: A swift, leader-driven, dag-based consortium blockchain with byzantine fault-tolerance. In IEEE INFO-COM 2025-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pages 1–10. IEEE, 2025.

[77] Wellington Fernandes Silvano and Roderval Marcelino. Iota tangle: A cryptocurrency to communicate internet-of-things data. Future genera-tion computer systems, 112:307–319, 2020.

[78] Sebastian Müller, Andreas Penzkofer, Nikita Polyanskii, Jonas Theis, William Sanders, and Hans Moog. Tangle 2.0 leaderless nakamoto consensus on the heaviest dag. IEEE Access, 10:105807–105842, 2022.

[79] Peilin He, Tao Yan, Chuanshan Huang, Nicolò Vallarano, and Claudio J Tessone. Welcome to the tangle: An empirical analysis of iota ledger in the chrysalis stage. In International Congress on Blockchain and Applications, pages 419–431. Springer, 2023.

[80] Vishnu Kumar. Interoperable knowledge graphs for localized supply chains: Leveraging graph databases and rdf standards. Logistics, 9(4):144, 2025.

[81] Hao Yin, Changling Zhou, Weiping Wen, and Yiwei Liu. Fountain: Dag-based separate bft consensus made hashgraph practical. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2025.

[82] Wanli Zhao and Satoshi Fujita. Hashgraph over the edge: Achieving byzantine fault tolerance in decentralized p2p frameworks. IEEE Access, 2025.

[83] Alexander Spiegelman, Neil Giridharan, Alberto Sonnino, and Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias. Bullshark: Dag bft protocols made practical. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 2705–2718, 2022.

[84] Idit Keidar, Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Oded Naor, and Alexander Spiegelman. All you need is dag. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 165–175, 2021.

[85] Xiaohai Dai, Guanxiong Wang, Jiang Xiao, Zhengxuan Guo, Rui Hao, Xia Xie, and Hai Jin. Lightdag: A low-latency dag-based bft consensus through lightweight broadcast. In 2024 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS), pages 998–1008. IEEE, 2024.

[86] Vivek Bagaria, Sreeram Kannan, David Tse, Giulia Fanti, and Pramod Viswanath. Prism: Deconstructing the blockchain to approach physical limits. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, pages 585–602, 2019.

[87] Hao Yang, Jing Chen, Kun He, Meng Jia, Kai Li, Chen Zhang, and Ruiying Du. Power: High-throughput blockchain based on computing power utilization. IEEE Transactions on Networking, 2026.

[88] Chenxin Li, Peilun Li, Dong Zhou, Zhe Yang, Ming Wu, Guang Yang, Wei Xu, Fan Long, and Andrew Chi-Chih Yao. A decentralized blockchain with high throughput and fast confirmation. In 2020 {USENIX} Annual Technical Conference ({USENIX} {ATC} 20), pages 515–528, 2020.

[89] Cheng Zhang, Yang Xu, Xiaowei Wu, En Wang, Hongbo Jiang, and Yaoxue Zhang. A semi-asynchronous decentralized federated learning framework via tree-graph blockchain. In IEEE INFOCOM 2024-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pages 1121–1130. IEEE, 2024.

[90] Yonatan Sompolinsky, Shai Wyborski, and Aviv Zohar. Phantom ghostdag: a scalable generalization of nakamoto consensus: September 2, 2021. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies, pages 57–70, 2021.

[91] Mohammad Javad Amiri, Divyakant Agrawal, and Amr El Abbadi. Caper: a cross-application permissioned blockchain. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 12(11), 2019.

[92] Zesong Dong, Wei Tong, Ailiang Zhong, Xiaojie Guo, Lingtao Xue, and Xuewen Dong. A secure and robust blockchain-based identity management scheme oriented to uav network. Blockchain: Research and Applications, page 100439, 2026.

[93] Shruti Mishra, Mohit Bhuria, Hitesh Singla, Sujata Pal, and Isaac Woun-gang. Relearn: Reinforcement learning enhanced profitable rebalancing in payment channel networks. In 2025 21th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2025.

[94] Zhonghui Ge, Chenke Wang, Yu Long, and Dawu Gu. Shaduf++: Non-cycle and privacy-preserving payment channel rebalancing. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 22(2):1281–1298, 2024.

[95] Debasis Mohanty, Divya Anand, Hani Moaiteq Aljahdali, and San-tos Gracia Villar. Blockchain interoperability: Towards a sustainable payment system. Sustainability, 14(2):913, 2022.

[96] Hu Xiong, Yan Wu, Chuanjie Jin, and Saru Kumari. Efficient and privacy-preserving authentication protocol for heterogeneous systems in iiot. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(12):11713–11724, 2020.

[97] Tien Tuan Anh Dinh, Rui Liu, Meihui Zhang, Gang Chen, Beng Chin Ooi, and Ji Wang. Untangling blockchain: A data processing view of blockchain systems. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 30(7):1366–1385, 2018.